ID Canada

A friend of mine recently linked me to an interesting new Canadian identitarian group called ID Canada. Their website is very professional and simple, they even have a little shop where you can buy stickers, flags and other merch. They describe themselves as an Ethno-Nationalist and Identitarian youth movement. Basically, that means they focus entirely on race, identity, and culture. A quote from their mission statement:

Canada is a nation of Europeans values, traditions, customs and culture. Canada was never meant to be a melting pot of third-world migration.

Is ID Canada a Political Party? 

No, they are a youth “activist” group that aims to spread awareness of mainly mass immigration to Canada. Why don’t they want to become an official political party to change official Canadian policy? Well, the leaders of this organization are obviously not complete retards. They probably realize you can’t run a political party that only focuses on immigration. The chances of winning the election are extremely low considering the fact that new immigrants are now a considerable portion of the Canadian population.  Toronto is considered the most diverse city in the world according to BBC. Foreign-born residents make up 51% of Toronto’s population of  2,731,571 (as of 2016). In a fair democracy to win the election, you will have to debate various issues such as economics and, foreign policy. The vast majority of citizens care more about those issues than identity and immigration. Canada’s democracy is quite strange and makes it nearly impossible for smaller parties to gain any traction.

It’s very difficult for small political parties to compete with the mainstream parties

This is because of the first past the post system. To become Prime Minister your party needs to have the most seats in the house of commons. Your party must have candidates elected in the various electoral districts or “constituencies” or “ridings” to win a seat for your party. So, when Canadians are voting they wouldn’t see Justin Trudeau on their ballot like Americans would see Donald Trump. They would see various names like John Smith or Mohammad Alalababa with the political party they are a member of. If you want to elect Justin Trudeau you will need to select the liberal candidate.

Can the identitarian movement gain any major traction in Canada? 

Identity Canada appears to be very inspired by the various popular identitarian groups in Western Europe. Groups like generation identitaire have been very successful. However, what works in Europe will not necessarily work in North America. European’s have a stronger sense of identity because their ancestors have been there for thousands of years. Their blood is deep in the soil. European nations have also been over 90% European until very recently when migrants from drastically different cultures flooded in very quickly. This obviously shocked a lot of citizens. Suddenly their countries went from peaceful to nearly a war zone.

Europeans have only been in North America for a few hundred years. Although we are descended from pioneers we don’t feel connected to the land. It’s easy for the regime and state-sponsored propaganda outlets to guilt us into feeling unattached to the land by mentioning how we invaded and pushed the Native Americans aside. We are told Canada and the United States are a nation of immigrants, we’re all descended from immigrants so we should invite more in and shut up about it. ID Canada wants to counter this through their “activism” but will they gain any traction?

Image result for identitaire
ID Canada’s high quality logo is aestetically similar to Generation Identitaire’s logo.

What Canadians care about

Do Canadians really care about immigration and demographic shifts? Do Canadians really want to defend their culture and ancestors? From my experience, they do not. Especially Canadians under 30. Young urban Canadians have grown up in a multicultural mess and that’s all they know. Perhaps ID Canada will have luck recruiting people in rural towns who are just getting a taste of that wonderful diversity. ID Canada wants to keep their group youthful by restricting membership to people under 35. This is not a good idea because it restricts good older folks from joining and providing much-needed wisdom and guidance.

Canadians are worried mainly about money. Although Canada has free healthcare, they are still capitalistic. This is because the means of production (factories, workplaces, warehouses etc…) are privately owned. The young are still drowning in student loan debt (although college and uni are a bit cheaper than the US they are still expected to pay). Rent prices (esp in the city) keep rising and they are worried about paying their bills. For most jobs, you need to live close to the city. Wages aren’t rising fast enough to keep up with real estate prices. The low and working class Canadians experience financial misery just as much as Americans.

Those who slip through the cracks of society are pushed aside and forgotten about. Toronto has an extremely large homeless population. You can’t walk down the street in Toronto without having at least 10-20 hobos beg for spare change. It’s so depressing. Although refugees get everything they need (housing/transportation/welfare cheques), citizens are living on the street. Economics can’t be ignored, they are extremely important. Failing to mention economic misery will restrict ID Canada’s potential member base to those who are either upper middle class or rich or to those who are not aware of what blights the majority of the populace.

Capitalism and Nationalism 

I wrote an article awhile ago about how capitalism and nationalism are not at all compatible. Most Canadians, especially the young already have an unfavourable opinion of capitalism. Barely any nationalists talk about how mass immigration is beneficial to the capitalist ruling class. Capitalists like shifting other countries populations like shifting workers from one factory to another. Their goal is to inflate the labour market to lower wages. Diversity is the capitalists strength, to keep wages low and people divided by culture. So they fight each other instead of targeting the capitalist who uses them as wage-slaves. ID Canada would gain a lot more traction if they pointed out this simple fact. This will make young anti-capitalist Canadians disapprove of mass immigration because they will realize that the liberal bourgeois characters like Trudeau don’t truly give a shit about non-whites, they just want to exploit them like they exploit the Canadian workers.

Folks like ID Canada need to think deeper instead of falling into the pitfalls of American White Nationalism. Multiculturalism is a lot more than an evil plot to exterminate Europeans. A mixed-race future is inevitable with such mass immigration by why would this be beneficial to those in power? Why do they care? What purpose do these immigrants serve? Think!

Capitalists want to make maximum profits and protect themselves against a socialist revolution. They are only loyal to money not nation. Multiculturalism is the perfect tool to create division so the working class attacks each other. The Capitalists laugh as poor whites and non-whites battle each other because it means they are not fighting against the Capitalist system and advocating for the abolition of their precious private property.

ID Canada can either go nowhere by protecting the capitalist system like a bunch of useful idiots or become a serious threat to the regime by attacking capitalist economics. Advocating for less non-white immigration isn’t enough – you have to think deeper and attack the reasons why this is happening. I personally will not support a group that refuses to address the serious problem of the capitalist plague.


Please follow and like us:

You may also like...


  1. Mark Robert says:

    Europeans are the Indigenous Americans:

    The Windover Archaeological Site is an Early Archaic (6000 to 5000 BC) archaeological site found in Brevard County near Titusville, Florida, USA, on the central east coast of the state. Windover is a muck pond where skeletal remains of 168 individuals were found buried in the peat at the bottom of the pond. well-preserved brain tissue was recovered from many skulls from the site. DNA from the brain tissue has been sequenced.

    Windover Pond represent the largest finds from the Archaic Period.

    The DNA evidence has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the first peoples to inhabit the Americas were the Europeans.

    Asians arrived much later in huge numbers and committed genocide against the Europeans who were already here.

    Google: The First Americans DNA Of The Windover Bog People
    Or Click link below…

    1. Caleb says:

      Also people from the carthage civilization that were European descendents landed in south America around 300 Bc and settled there. Their descedents can be found in peru and they look European to this day. The kinnewic man is theorized to be European as well. Native americans gained technology very fast through European contact pre-Colombian times. The fabric could have been taken by or traded by the windover people’s. The use of bronze and iron was taken from or traded from the Vikings and carthage people’s. The natives in the American northeast was taken from the Vikings.

  2. John says:

    I love your paintings, Veronica- your political economics, not so much. Our European people were the first to recognize the sacred value of property rights. After millennia of tribal savagery, where men attempted to live without property rights enshrined and protected by law, European man created Civilization, that is, the possibility of a civilized society, by affirming a person’s right to labor with the intent to aquire and develop property. White people created the idea that Life, Liberty, and Property we’re essential to the material well being of all men. White Civilization cannot survive the decline of this vital idea. Capitalism is perfectly compatible with healthy Nationalism. Witness the success of Japan, Korea(soon to be United -thanks Trump!), Hong Kong, Singapore, Hungary, Russia, Poland, and until very recently the whole of Western Europe. Capitalist Western Europe. Cultural Marxism is the malevolent force you imagine Free Enterprise to be. With affection, JV.

    1. Mark Robert says:

      Kennewick Man is theorized to be European???

      Forensic anthropologist, archaeologist, and paleontologist agree race is real…

      Caucasion: Skull: Dolicephalic(Long-Head),High forehead,Little supraobital development.Face: Mainly Leptoproscopic( Narrow)Sometimes Meso- or even Euryproscopic, Neither Facial nor alveolar prognathism occurs except among some archaic peoples. Nose:Long,narrow,high in both root and bridge.

      Mongoloid: Skull: High incidence of Brachycephaly(Short Round Head) American Indians while Mongoloid are often Dolicephalic. Foreheads slightly lower than that of the Caucasoid. No Supraobital development. Face: Wide and short, projecting cheek bones, Prognathism rare. Shovel shaped incisors common especialy in Asia. Nose: Mesorine(Low and Broad in both root and bridge.

      Negroid: Skull: usually Dolicephalic, a small minority are Brachycephalic. Forehead most often high, little supraobital development. Face: Leproscopic (to a much lesser degree than the Caucasion), Prognathism common in most Negro populations. Nose: Low & broad in root and bridge with characteristic depression at root.

      Ethnographic division into races from Meyers Konversationslexikon of 1885-90 is listing: Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid.
      • Caucasian races (Aryans, Hamites, Semites)
      • Mongolian races (northern Mongolian, Chinese and Indo-Chinese, Japanese and Korean, Tibetan, Malayan, Polynesian, Maori, Micronesian, Eskimo, American Indian),
      • Negroid races (African, Hottentots, Melanesians/Papua, “Negrito”, Australian Aborigine, Dravidians, Sinhalese)

      I know Dr. Chatters concluded the skull was “Caucasoid”

      I’m no forensic expert; but even I could see that Dr. Chatters gave clear evidence in his video demonstration to the reason he arrived at his conclusion…

      Caucasion: Skull: Dolicephalic (Long-Head), High forehead, Little supraobital development. Face: Mainly Leptoproscopic (Narrow) Sometimes Meso- or even Euryproscopic, Neither Facial nor alveolar prognathism occurs except among some archaic peoples. Nose: Long, narrow, high in both root and bridge.

      1. Caleb says:

        Chill out dude. I heard the kinnewic man was European from my American history class, and my teacher said it was a theory. Race is real yes there is differences in culture, facial features and skin color, and medical differences are different for each race.

        1. Mark Robert says:


          My outraged is NOT directed towards you my friend…

          My outraged directed towards the system.

  3. Michael says:

    Articles are looking better and better!
    Keep up the good work 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *